<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=179294"><dc:title>The (im)possibility of primary arts teacher education</dc:title><dc:creator>Meiners,	Jeff	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Rowlands,	Kerrin	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>arts education</dc:subject><dc:subject>arts specialism</dc:subject><dc:subject>curriculum</dc:subject><dc:subject>policy</dc:subject><dc:subject>primary generalist teacher</dc:subject><dc:description>UNESCO strategies, including the 2006 Road Map for Arts Education, the 2010 Seoul Agenda for Arts Education and the 2024 Framework for Culture  and  Arts  Education,  highlight  a  persistent  concern  regarding  the  insufficient  emphasis  on  arts  education  competencies  among  pre-service  teachers  and  the  challenge  of  allocating  adequate  curriculum  time  in  education  programmes.  In  Australia,  recent  government  policies  have  included  the  arts  as  a  school  curriculum  learning  area  with  five  subjects:  Dance,  Drama,  Media  Arts,  Music  and  Visual  Arts.  This  curriculum aims to ensure that all young Australians experience a com-prehensive arts education by providing a framework for teachers to implement  sequential  learning  across  the  primary  school  years.  Despite  these  efforts,  Australian  research  tracking  the  implementation  of  the  arts curriculum within schools and teacher education programmes remains limited, revealing a problematic gap. The present paper examines how an Australian university has attempted to address this gap by providing  pre-service  teachers  with  an  “Arts  Specialism”  within  a  teacher  education  programme.  Using  education  policy  sociology  theory,  the  study  explores  the  contexts  of  influence,  curriculum  text  production  and policy implementation. Critical discourse analysis is used to identify negotiations between influential Australian stakeholders, including university  programme  leaders  who  have  supported  the  concept  of  an  arts  curriculum  specialism.  The  study  addresses  themes  of  arts  education  content  and  pedagogy,  revealing  challenges  and  opportunities  in  implementing  this  specialism  and  concluding  with  recommendations  for future developments.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2026-02-10 11:10:52</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>179294</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:rights>Podatek o licenci CC-BY 4.0 je naveden na spletni strani revije (https://ojs.cepsj.si/index.php/cepsj/about). (Datum opombe 10. 2. 2026)</dc:rights></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
