<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=178479"><dc:title>Deep learning as machine metis</dc:title><dc:creator>Krašovec,	Primož	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>Leroi-Gourhan</dc:subject><dc:subject>deep learning</dc:subject><dc:subject>intelligence</dc:subject><dc:subject>intuition</dc:subject><dc:subject>metis</dc:subject><dc:subject>creativity</dc:subject><dc:description>This article situates current deep learning (DL) artificial intelligence (AI) within Leroi-Gourhan’s deep history of the human species’ relation to technology. According to Leroi-Gourhan, technology is both a key element of anthropogenesis and a source of later tensions (or disentanglement) between the human species and its external and increasingly autonomous technics. Human organic (life-oriented) intelligence at first extends itself through technical (machine-oriented) intelligence, only to be later left behind by it. We propose a concept of machine intelligence that goes beyond technical intelligence, the latter a (still) hybrid human–machine intelligence. This new, emerging machine intelligence is DL AI. DL AI developed out of the failure of symbolic AI to instantiate a key generic component of intelligence: creativity. While symbolic AI was rigid and pre-programmed, DL is flexible and unpredictable, presenting an embryonic form of actual machine intelligence. Its creativity can be likened to the ancient Greek concept of metis, a cunning and polymorphous form of intelligence. Although often biased and problematic, DL exhibits a machine creativity that goes beyond the anthropocentric imaginings of AI as a (mechanistic) imitation of the human norm.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2026-01-28 14:39:06</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>178479</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
