<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=178163"><dc:title>Measuring catastrophic forgetting in cross-lingual classification</dc:title><dc:creator>Koloski,	Boshko	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Škrlj,	Blaž	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Robnik Šikonja,	Marko	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pollak,	Senja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>cross-lingual transfer</dc:subject><dc:subject>cross-lingual learning</dc:subject><dc:subject>catastrophic-forgetting</dc:subject><dc:subject>document classification</dc:subject><dc:description>Cross-lingual transfer leverages knowledge from a resource-rich source language, commonly English, to enhance performance in less-resourced target languages. Two widely used strategies are: Cross-Lingual Validation (CLV), which involves training on the source language and validating on the target language, and Intermediate Training (IT), where models are first fine-tuned on the source language and then further trained on the target language. While both strategies have been studied, their effects on encoder-based models for classification tasks remain underexplored. In this paper, we systematically compare these strategies across six multilingual classification tasks, evaluating downstream performance, catastrophic forgetting, and both zero-shot and full-shot scenarios. Additionally, we contrast parameter-efficient adapter methods with full-parameter fine-tuning. Our results show that IT generally performs better in the target language, whereas CLV more effectively preserves source-language knowledge across multiple cross-lingual transfers. These findings underscore the trade-offs between optimizing target performance and mitigating catastrophic forgetting.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2026-01-20 14:45:51</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>178163</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
