<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=177786"><dc:title>Revolutions as structural breaks</dc:title><dc:creator>Garoupa,	Nuno	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Spruk,	Rok	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>economic policy</dc:subject><dc:subject>economic history</dc:subject><dc:subject>quantitative analysis</dc:subject><dc:subject>synthetic control method</dc:subject><dc:subject>institutional change</dc:subject><dc:subject>long-run development</dc:subject><dc:subject>Iran</dc:subject><dc:description>This paper examines whether major political institutional disruptions produce temporary shocks or structural breaks in long-term development. Using the 1979 Iranian Revolution as a natural experiment, we apply the synthetic control method to estimate its causal effect on economic growth and institutional quality. Drawing on a panel of 66 countries from 1950 to 2015, we construct counterfactual trajectories for Iran in the absence of revolutionary change. Our results show a persistent and statistically significant divergence in per capita GDP, institutional quality, and legal constraints on executive power. We perform in-space and in-time placebo tests to rule out confounding events, such as the Iran-Iraq War and international sanctions, and propose confidence interval estimation to address uncertainty in treatment effects. The findings identify the Iranian Revolution as a structural institutional rupture, with implications for the classification of institutional change more broadly. We contribute a generalizable empirical framework for distinguishing between temporary and structural institutional shocks in long-run development.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2026-01-07 13:05:19</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>177786</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
