<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=177780"><dc:title>Teachers’ attitudes, concerns, and competences regarding the inclusion of students with special educational needs in mainstream primary schools in Slovenia</dc:title><dc:creator>Prosen,	Simona	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Smrtnik Vitulić,	Helena	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>special educational needs</dc:subject><dc:subject>inclusion</dc:subject><dc:subject>teacher</dc:subject><dc:subject>attitude</dc:subject><dc:subject>mainstream schools</dc:subject><dc:description>The  article  presents  the  attitudes,  concerns,  and  perceived  competencies  of  Slovenian teachers regarding the inclusion of students with special educational needs (SEN) in mainstream primary schools. The 126 participating teachers self-assessed  these  topics  using  a  questionnaire  specifically  designed  for  the  study. The findings indicate that teachers are generally supportive of inclusive practices. However, their attitudes vary considerably depending on the type of SEN: teachers are generally in favour of the inclusion of students with long-term illness, physical disabilities, autistic spectrum disorders, emotional and behavioral difficulties, and specific learning difficulties, but have significant reservations  about  the  inclusion  of  students  with  blindness  and  visual  impairment,  deafness  and  hearing  loss,  speech  and  language  disabilities,  and  intellectual  disabilities.  These  attitudes  are  consistent  regardless  of  the  teacher’s length of professional experience. Teachers described several concerns regarding inclusion and reported different levels of competency for teaching students with different types of SEN. Finally, the results of the study show a clear connection between teachers’ perceived higher competence and their more positive attitudes towards inclusion. The study highlights critical gaps in  inclusion  implementation  in  Slovenia  and  provides  further  suggestions  for teacher training and professional development, particularly in relation to students with SEN.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2026-01-07 10:16:19</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>177780</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
