<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=177765"><dc:title>Evaluating the psychosocial impacts of e-care use among older people receiving long-term care in Slovenia through the adapted PIADS-10 scale</dc:title><dc:creator>Lebar,	Lea	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Natek,	Izidor	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Hvalič Touzery,	Simona	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Jutai,	Jeffrey William	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Dolničar,	Vesna	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>assistive technology</dc:subject><dc:subject>e-care</dc:subject><dc:subject>psychosocial impacts</dc:subject><dc:subject>long-term care</dc:subject><dc:subject>older people</dc:subject><dc:subject>PiaDs</dc:subject><dc:description>Purpose: assistive technologies (ats), including e-care, are increasingly vital in supporting the ageing population’s long-term care; however, there is a scarcity of studies analysing the psychosocial impacts of e-care use among older people. the goal of this paper is twofold: first, to understand the psychosocial impacts of e-care use among older people receiving long-term care, and second, to evaluate the measurement properties of an internationally recognised self-report questionnaire, the Psychosocial impact of assistive Devices scale (PiaDs-10), specifically its multidimensionality and internal consistency of identified subscales. Materials and methods: a one-group post-test-only quasi-experimental intervention design was employed. Psychosocial impacts of e-care use were examined through an intervention study involving 217 older people in Slovenia, who tested e-care over an average period of 310.2 days. Participants were selected using purposive sampling. Results: Findings revealed important enhancements in perceived security, sense of control, independence and overall quality of life among e-care users. exploratory factor analysis of the PiaDs-10 yielded two factors (psychological well-being and adaptability), supporting a reduced 8-item version (si-PiaDs-8), which was further supported through confirmatory factor analysis. Conclusions: these findings indicate that the PiaDs-10 could be refined to an 8-item, two-factor version with improved relevance for assessing psychosocial impacts among older adults using e-care. such insights can help stakeholders design and adapt ats that better support ageing in place.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2026-01-06 15:54:20</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>177765</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
