<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=176183"><dc:title>Who should lead nuclear fusion research?</dc:title><dc:creator>Giacometti,	Alessio	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Oltra,	Christian	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Bustreo,	Chiara	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Turcanu,	Catrinel	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Stankiewicz,	Piotr	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Meskens,	Gaston	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Čok,	Vanja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Prades,	Ana	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pellegrini-Masini,	Giuseppe	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Orlando,	Maria Teresa	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>fusion energy</dc:subject><dc:subject>private fusion</dc:subject><dc:subject>public-private partnerships</dc:subject><dc:subject>science governance</dc:subject><dc:subject>social acceptability</dc:subject><dc:subject>public attitudes</dc:subject><dc:description>Nuclear fusion research is experiencing unprecedented momentum, driven by public investment and a surge in private start-ups claiming to accelerate commercialization distinct from government-led initiatives. This shift towards private leadership is a new dynamic, yet its implications for public perception and social acceptance have been largely overlooked. This study addresses that critical gap using exploratory findings from a large-scale, cross-national survey in 21 European countries (N = 19,144). We analyzed public preferences for who should lead fusion research and used multinomial logistic regression to identify associated demographic and trust-related factors. Results show a clear public consensus favoring a collaborative model: an overwhelming majority (74 %) believe governments and private companies should be equally involved. In contrast, only 20 % prefer a government-led model and just 6 % a private-led one. The regression analysis reveals that being of older age and female gender is associated with a higher likelihood of preferring this collaborative approach. Furthermore, higher trust in scientists is linked to a lower preference for private-sector leadership. This study provides the first large-scale empirical evidence of public preferences for fusion governance, highlighting a potential misalignment between the industry's push for privatization and the public's desire for collaboration. We discuss these findings by drawing on literature regarding anti-industry sentiment and public skepticism towards the powerful institutions controlling new technologies. The findings suggest citizens desire a balance of strengths, viewing neither the state nor private firms as solely trustworthy to manage the quest for fusion energy.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2025-11-24 12:37:51</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>176183</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
