<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=175883"><dc:title>Eliminating seasonal energy storage needs through envelope design</dc:title><dc:creator>Kralj,	Aleš	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kurnitski,	Jarek	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Žnidaršič,	Matjaž	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Medved,	Sašo	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Domjan,	Suzana	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Halilovič,	Miroslav	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>life-cycle cost analysis</dc:subject><dc:subject>quadruple glazing</dc:subject><dc:subject>zero-emission buildings</dc:subject><dc:subject>high-performance glazing</dc:subject><dc:subject>energy efficiency</dc:subject><dc:subject>heating demand</dc:subject><dc:description>Space-heating peaks and associated seasonal storage needs remain the bottleneck for zero-emission buildings; windows are pivotal because their thermal losses set winter demand. This study’s objective is to quantify the energy, peak-load, and life-cycle-cost (LCC) impacts of argon-filled quadruple glazing (QGU) relative to triple (TGU) and quintuple (5GU) units, and to derive a climate-robust and energy price level criterion for adoption. We coupled multilayer window models to a dynamic simulation (IDA ICE) of an office floor in two climates (Ljubljana, Oslo) across four native SHGC levels, then performed a 30-year LCC analysis using observed manufacturing prices, gross-margin assumptions, and electricity-price scenarios; we mapped cost-parity as a function of heating-degree-days (HDD). QGU systematically reduced delivered heating energy and peak heating power versus TGU, with a small cooling increase, yielding LCC parity in colder conditions at observed prices and margins; in milder climates, parity depended on higher electricity prices or lower margins. The research con- tributes (i) the first LCC assessment of commercially manufactured argon-filled QGU grounded in measured pricing and dynamic simulation, and (ii) an HDD-based adoption criterion that links envelope choice to lower winter peaks and reduced seasonal storage requirements without added life-cycle cost, offering guidance for high-WWR design and envelope policy.</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2025-11-12 14:08:39</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>175883</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
