<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=173541"><dc:title>On the effect of different Eurocode 2-based modelling choices on the calculated fire resistance of RC columns</dc:title><dc:creator>Rogulj,	Marko	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Harapin,	Alen	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Češarek,	Peter	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kolšek Češarek,	Jerneja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>fire analysis</dc:subject><dc:subject>RC column</dc:subject><dc:subject>simplified procedures</dc:subject><dc:subject>advanced procedures</dc:subject><dc:subject>natural fires</dc:subject><dc:subject>EC2</dc:subject><dc:description>This paper examines the impact of different modelling choices on the fire performance of RC columns using Eurocode 2 in a real-world case study. The methodology includes a comparative analysis of simplified and advanced numerical simulations, employing FDS for fire curves and ABAQUS for thermal and mechanical analyses. Results show how modelling assumptions affect load-bearing capacity and fire resistance. Conclusions emphasise balancing safety and efficiency, highlighting the importance of variable axial loads and multiple heat zones for accurate fire resistance assessment</dc:description><dc:date>2025</dc:date><dc:date>2025-09-18 09:46:24</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>173541</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>