<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=167421"><dc:title>Perceptions of patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals toward telemedicine use for cognitive and movement disorders in the Aegean Islands, Greece</dc:title><dc:creator>Angelopoulou,	Efthalia	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kontaxopoulou,	Dionysia	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Fragkiadaki,	Stella	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Stanitsa,	Evangelia	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pavlou,	Dimosthenis	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Papatriantafyllou,	John	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Koros,	Christos	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Dimovski,	Vlado	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Šemrov,	Darja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Papageorgiou,	Sokratis G.	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>telemedicine</dc:subject><dc:subject>teleneurology</dc:subject><dc:subject>Alzheimer’s disease</dc:subject><dc:subject>Parkinson’s disease</dc:subject><dc:subject>dementia</dc:subject><dc:subject>cognitive
impairment</dc:subject><dc:subject>movement disorders</dc:subject><dc:subject>telehealth</dc:subject><dc:subject>telecare</dc:subject><dc:description>Background: Patients with neurodegenerative diseases who live in remote areas often have limited access to specialized healthcare, and telemedicine represents a useful solution. The aim of this study was to investigate the perceptions toward the use of a specialized-tertiary telemedicine service of patients with cognitive and movement disorders, caregivers, and local healthcare professionals (HPs) in the Aegean Islands. Methods: Data were derived from the "Specialized Outpatient Clinic of Memory, Dementia and Parkinson’s disease through the National Telemedicine Network", March 2021 March 2023. The survey included 10 questions (5-point Likert scale). Results: We received 64 questionnaires (25 patients, 18 caregivers, 21 HPs). Most participants positively perceived all aspects of telemedicine, including comfort (mean ± standard deviation: patients 4.5 ± 0.9, caregivers: 4.8 ± 0.5, HPs: 4.6 ± 0.7), access to specialized care (4.7 ± 0.6, 4.7 ± 0.5, 4.9 ± 0.4), number of transportations (4.6 ± 0.8, 4.6 ± 0.9, 4.8 ± 0.5), adequacy of follow-up (4.6 ± 0.7, 4.4 ± 0.8, 4.2 ± 0.7), future telemedicine selection (4.8 ± 0.4, 4.8 ± 0.4, 4.6 ± 0.6), perceived reliable medical assessment (4.7 ± 0.5, 4.6 ± 0.6, 4.3 ± 0.6), information delivery (4.7 ± 0.6, 4.6 ± 0.5, 4.4 ± 0.9), health status improvement (4.6 ± 0.7, 4.6 ± 0.6, 4.0 ± 0.7), cost (4.6 ± 1, 4.6 ± 1, 5.0 ± 0.2), and general satisfaction (4.8 ± 0.4, 4.7 ± 0.5, 4.5 ± 0.6). The commonest recommendations were more frequent visits, medical specialties, and dissemination of information. Conclusions: The positive perception of participants highlights the value of telemedicine for specialized healthcare for neurodegenerative disorders, especially in remote areas.</dc:description><dc:date>2024</dc:date><dc:date>2025-02-20 17:00:51</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>167421</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
