<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=166405"><dc:title>The effects of sodium hydrogen carbonate ingestion during the recovery period between two 200-m front-crawl time trials</dc:title><dc:creator>Ušaj,	Anton	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Marčun,	Robert	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Štrumbelj,	Boro	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>blood alkalosis</dc:subject><dc:subject>acidosis</dc:subject><dc:subject>blood gases</dc:subject><dc:subject>acid–base balance</dc:subject><dc:description>Purpose The aim of this study was to determine how sodium hydrogen carbonate (NaHCO$_3$) ingestion during a 1-h recovery period after a 200-m front-crawl swim affects blood–gas levels, acid–base balance, and performance during a successive trial. 
Methods Fourteen national-level male swimmers (age: 21 ± 3 years, body mass (BM): 77 ± 10 kg, stature: 181 ± 7 cm) performed four maximal 200-m front-crawl tests. On one of the two days, the swimmers swam two 200-m tests with a 1-h recovery break, during which they drank water (WATER); on the other day, they performed the same protocol but consumed 0.3 g min$^{−1}$ NaHCO$_3$ solution during the recovery break (NaHCO$_3$). 
Results The ingestion of NaHCO$_3$ before the second test had no effect on swim time despite a greater [HCO$^−_3$] (19.2 ± 2.3 mmol L$^{−1}$) than that measured during the first test (NaHCO$_3$) (14.5 ± 1.1 mmol L$^{−1}$) and the other two tests (WATER) (12.7 ± 2.4 and 14.8 ± 1.5 mmol L$^{−1}$; F = 18.554; p = 0.000) and a higher blood pH (7.46 ± 0.03) than that measured during the first test (NaHCO$_3$) (7.39 ± 0.02) and the other two tests (WATER) (7.16 ± 0.04 and 7.20 ± 0.05); (F = 5.255; p = 0.004). An increase in blood pCO$_2$ (0.2 ± 0.3 kPa) between both tests (NaHCO$_3$) compared to unchanged pCO$_2$ values (− 0.1 ± 0.3 kPa) between the other two tests (WATER) (t = − 2.984; p = 0.011; power = 0.741) was confirmed. 
Conclusions NaHCO$_3$ ingestion during the recovery period between two 200-m front-crawl time trials had a strong buffering effect that did not positively affect performance. An increase in pCO$_2$ may have counterbalanced this impact.</dc:description><dc:date>2024</dc:date><dc:date>2025-01-10 10:54:51</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>166405</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
