<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=164998"><dc:title>Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a handheld myotonometer measuring myofascial stiffness of lower lumbar myofascial tissue in healthy adults</dc:title><dc:creator>Valenti,	Fabio	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Meden,	Sara	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Frangež,	Maja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Vauhnik,	Renata	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>reliability</dc:subject><dc:subject>hand held dynamometry</dc:subject><dc:subject>myotonPRO</dc:subject><dc:subject>spine</dc:subject><dc:subject>fascia</dc:subject><dc:description>Background: Biomechanical muscle properties, such as stiffness, can be valuable
indicators of tissue health and show promise as a diagnostic and treatment measure
for chronic low back pain (CLBP). The development of accessible assessment
technologies, such as the MyotonPRO portable device, allows for the convenient
quantification of muscle tone and stiffness changes. The aim of this study is to assess
the reliability of lumbar erector spinae muscle stiffness with the MyotonPRO in
healthy adults and to compare stiffness changes between prone and sitting position.
Methods: Thirty asymptomatic participants (N = 15 women and N = 15 men) aged
between 18 and 65 years were recruited to participate in this study. Two examiners
tested muscle stiffness at the palpable muscle belly, one finger away from the spinous
process at the level of the L4 vertebra, first from the left and then from the right side,
both in prone position and after in sitting position. For inter-rater reliability, all
participants were tested by two examiners on the same day, and intra-rater reliability
was calculated using the same examiner’s assessment results with an exact 24-h
interval. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error measures (SEM) and
minimum detectable change (MDC) with a 95% confidence interval were calculated
to assess intra-rater and inter-rater reliability.
Results: Statistical analysis revealed good intra-rater reliability with an ICC of 0.88
(95% CI [0.76–0.94]) for the stiffness of the left erector spinae and excellent
intra-rater reliability with an ICC of 0.91 (95% CI [0.82–0.95]) for the right
erector spinae, both in the prone position. Intra-rater reliability in the sitting position
was excellent to very good with an ICC of 0.91 (95% CI [0.82–0.96]) for the left side
and an ICC of 0.89 (95% CI [0.78–0.95]) for the right side. The results for the
left-sided prone position showed good inter-rater reliability with an ICC of 0.87
(95% CI [0.73–0.94]). The prone position on the right side also showed good
inter-rater reliability with an ICC of 0.84 (95% CI [0.68–0.92]). The inter-rater
reliability for the left and right side in the sitting position was excellent with an ICC of
0.96 (95% CI [0.92–0.98]) for the left side and an ICC of 0.95 (95% CI [0.90–0.97])
for the right side.
</dc:description><dc:date>2024</dc:date><dc:date>2024-11-20 09:55:01</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>164998</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
