<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=164648"><dc:title>Time for a new political regime typology? A vectoral classification to address intraregime shifts and international dynamics</dc:title><dc:creator>Den Bosch,	Jeroen van	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>dictatorship</dc:subject><dc:subject>authoritarianism</dc:subject><dc:subject>totalitarianism</dc:subject><dc:subject>personalism</dc:subject><dc:subject>tyranny</dc:subject><dc:subject>ideology</dc:subject><dc:subject>pluralism</dc:subject><dc:subject>vektorska klasifikacija</dc:subject><dc:description>This article proposes a novel typology for classifying political regimes, addressing the limitations of previous models by incorporating three organisational nexuses (party-organisations, militaries, tutelary bodies) and three vectoral dimensions (tyranny, ideology, multipartyism). This approach allows for a dynamic understanding of regime behaviour, capturing intra-regime shifts without requiring reclassification. The typology innovatively distinguishes between personalist regimes, ideocracies, and hybrid forms, providing a nuanced framework for analysing contemporary and historical political systems. By integrating ideology back into the analysis and offering a comprehensive measure of tyranny, this classification enhances our ability to study regime resilience, autocratisation, and democratisation, as well as how political regimes collaborate and learn in the international system.</dc:description><dc:date>2024</dc:date><dc:date>2024-11-06 11:13:07</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>164648</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
