<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=156114"><dc:title>Re-inventing Chinese philosophy through the method of sublation</dc:title><dc:creator>Rošker,	Jana S.	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>Chinese philosophy</dc:subject><dc:subject>comparative philosophy</dc:subject><dc:subject>sublation</dc:subject><dc:subject>methodology</dc:subject><dc:subject>post-comparative research</dc:subject><dc:description>In this article, I will introduce and describe my current research work, which centres on re-interpreting Chinese philosophy by implementing an innovative approach suitable for transcultural philosophical comparisons. To commence this undertaking, I was com-pelled to address certain issues, leading me to seek a novel methodology for transcultural research. This article will begin by briefly addressing the still existing general problems of transcultural philosophical comparisons. I will then examine the recent and current landscape of research in the field of Chinese comparative philosophy, with a specific focus on emerging paradigms referred to as “post-comparative” approaches.In the latter part of this paper, building upon a concise overview of my previous research findings, I will elucidate the current stage of development of the method of sublation. Furthermore, I will provide a theoretical framework outlining the subsequent phases of investigation.</dc:description><dc:date>2024</dc:date><dc:date>2024-05-08 15:56:50</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>156114</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
