<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=155354"><dc:title>The reliability, validity and usefulness of the 30–15 intermittent fitness test for cardiorespiratory fitness assessment in military personnel</dc:title><dc:creator>Paravlić,	Armin	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Šimunič,	Boštjan	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pišot,	Rado	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Rauter,	Samo	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Štuhec,	Stanko	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Vodičar,	Janez	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>sport</dc:subject><dc:subject>intermittent fitness test</dc:subject><dc:subject>reliability</dc:subject><dc:subject>validity</dc:subject><dc:subject>usefulness</dc:subject><dc:subject>cardiorespiratory fitness assessment</dc:subject><dc:subject>military personnel</dc:subject><dc:subject>health occupations</dc:subject><dc:subject>physiology</dc:subject><dc:description>The objectives of this study were to investigate the reliability, validity, and usefulness of the 30–15 intermittent fitness test (30–15$_{IFT}$) in soldiers. The 34 infantry members of the Slovenian armed forces were recruited as participants. Participants performed the continuous incremental treadmill test (TR), a 2-mile run (2$_{MR}$) test, and two 30–15$_{IFT}$ tests. Additionally, participants were divided into a highest-scoring group (HSG) and a lowest-scoring group (LSG) based on their scores on the Army Physical Fitness Test. A very high reliability ratings were observed for 30–15$_{IFT}$ measures, as follows: end-running speed (ERS) ERS$_{IFT}$ (ICC= 0.971), maximal heart rate (HR$_{max}$) HR$_{maxIFT}$ (IC= 0.960), and maximal relative oxygen consumption (VO$_{2max}$) VO$_{2max-IFT}$ (ICC= 0.975). Although 30–15$_{IFT}$ measures demonstrated high correlations (r = 0.695–0.930) to the same measures of TR test, ERS, HR$_{max}$ and VO$_{2max}$ were higher in the 30–15$_{IFT}$ (p &gt; 0.05). Furthermore, ERS$_{IFT}$ and predicted VO$_{2maxIFT}$ were higher in HSG compared to LSG, whereas HR$_{max}$ did not differ. The results of this study show that the 30–15$_{IFT}$ test is a reliable, valid and useful tool for assessing cardiorespiratory fitness in the armed forces. Moreover, the ERS and predicted VO$_2$max values derived from the 30–15$_{IFT}$ could be considered more sensitive markers of combat readiness than the parameters derived from the TR and 2$_{MR}$ tests.</dc:description><dc:date>2022</dc:date><dc:date>2024-03-27 12:27:35</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>155354</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
