<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=155058"><dc:title>Purity decay rate in random circuits with different configurations of gates</dc:title><dc:creator>Bensa,	Jaš	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Žnidarič,	Marko	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>quantum mechanics</dc:subject><dc:subject>statistical mechanics</dc:subject><dc:subject>quantum circuits</dc:subject><dc:subject>quantum gates</dc:subject><dc:subject>quantum information theory</dc:subject><dc:subject>quantum statistical mechanics</dc:subject><dc:subject>quantum information</dc:subject><dc:subject>science and technology</dc:subject><dc:subject>statistical physics</dc:subject><dc:subject>thermodynamics</dc:subject><dc:description>We study purity decay—a measure of bipartite entanglement—in a chain of $n$ qubits under the action of various geometries of nearest-neighbor random two-site unitary gates. We use a Markov chain description of average purity evolution, using further reduction to obtain a transfer matrix of only polynomial dimension in $n$. In most circuits, an exception being the brick-wall configuration, purity decays to its asymptotic value in two stages: the initial thermodynamically relevant decay persisting up to extensive times is $\sim \lambda^t_{eff}$, with $\lambda_{eff}$ not necessarily being in the spectrum of the transfer matrix, while the ultimate asymptotic decay is given by the second largest eigenvalue $\lambda_2$ of the transfer matrix. The effective rate $\lambda_{eff}$ depends on the location of bipartition boundaries as well as on the geometry of applied gates.</dc:description><dc:date>2023</dc:date><dc:date>2024-03-18 13:12:02</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>155058</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
