<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=153178"><dc:title>Borderless fear?</dc:title><dc:creator>Thiele,	Daniel	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pajnik,	Mojca	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sauer,	Birgit	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Šori,	Iztok	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>right-wing populism</dc:subject><dc:subject>migration</dc:subject><dc:subject>discourse</dc:subject><dc:subject>affects</dc:subject><dc:subject>framing</dc:subject><dc:subject>Austria</dc:subject><dc:subject>Slovenia</dc:subject><dc:description>Studies have highlighted differences between right-wing populism in Western and Central Eastern Europe but suggested that discourses have been converging since the so-called “refugee crisis” in 2015. This article examines this claim by focusing on right-wing populist frames and affective communication on migration in Austria and Slovenia. Taking a communication-centred approach, the study is based on a critical frame analysis of 70 speeches from far-right to centre-right parties in parliamentary debates on migration between 2015 and 2019. The results show that right-wing populist discourses in the two adjacent countries have aligned in appealing to affects, particularly to fear and in framing migration as a threat to security and culture. Despite differences in mobilizing affects, the findings indicate a mutual alignment of right-wing populism beyond borders, signalling a potential risk of a broader right-wing populist bloc unified by fear of migration.</dc:description><dc:date>2024</dc:date><dc:date>2023-12-20 10:11:00</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>153178</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language><dc:coverage>Avstrija; Slovenija; </dc:coverage></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
