<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=147390"><dc:title>Parametric analysis of fatigue-resistant elastocaloric regenerators</dc:title><dc:creator>Ahčin,	Žiga	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Tušek,	Jaka	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>elastocaloric effect</dc:subject><dc:subject>caloric cooling</dc:subject><dc:subject>Ni-Ti</dc:subject><dc:subject>regenerators</dc:subject><dc:subject>parametric analysis</dc:subject><dc:description>Elastocaloric cooling has recently shown high potential as an environmentally friendly alternative to vapor-compression technology. Here, we have studied and analyzed the geometric characteristics of two active elastocaloric regenerators (AeCRs) that were proved to have high application potential, i.e., a shell-and-tube AeCR loaded in compression and a parallel-plate AeCR loaded in tension, with the goal of maximizing their cooling performance. For this purpose, a previously developed and experimentally verified 1D numerical model was used. We focused only on the geometries and operating conditions that allow for durable, i.e., buckling-free operation in compression and fatigue-resistant operation in tension. The results show that although the applied strain of the parallel-plate AeCR loaded in tension needs to be limited (below 2%) to ensure fatigue-resistant operation, it outperforms (in terms of cooling power and COP at 15 K of temperature span) the shell-and-tube AeCR, which due to buckling issues suffers from a poorer heat-transfer geometry, but can withstand higher strains due to compressive loading. At the maximum strain of 2%, the optimum parallel-plate AeCR can generate a maximum cooling power of 1825 W (corresponding to 7075 W kg$^{−1}$ of elastocaloric material) and a COP of 9.15 at a zero-temperature span. On the other hand, due to a higher applied strain (3%) the optimum shell-and-tube AeCR can generate a higher maximum temperature span at zero cooling power (up to 50 K) but has limited cooling performance at lower temperature spans. In addition, the layering of the shell-and-tube AeCR was investigated for the first time to improve its performance. This study shows the crucial impact of the heat-transfer geometry (heat-transfer area and hydraulic diameter), which needs to be further improved in compression-loaded AeCRs to improve their efficiencies (without compromising the buckling stability). The study also shows the importance of the applied strain, which needs to be at least 2% or more to achieve a high cooling performance of the AeCR. The obtained results should serve as guidelines for designing powerful and efficient AeCRs in the future.</dc:description><dc:date>2023</dc:date><dc:date>2023-07-04 11:29:07</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>147390</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
