<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=143812"><dc:title>Literature reviews as independent studies</dc:title><dc:creator>Kraus,	Sascha	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Breier,	Matthias	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Lim,	Weng Marc	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Dabić,	Marina	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>industrial organization</dc:subject><dc:subject>information technology</dc:subject><dc:subject>innovational activity</dc:subject><dc:subject>literature reviews</dc:subject><dc:subject>bibliometrics</dc:subject><dc:subject>meta analysis</dc:subject><dc:subject>methods</dc:subject><dc:subject>contributions</dc:subject><dc:description>Review articles or literature reviews are a critical part of scientific research. While numerous guides on literature reviews exist, these are often limited to the phi- losophy of review procedures, protocols, and nomenclatures, triggering non-par- simonious reporting and confusion due to overlapping similarities. To address the aforementioned limitations, we adopt a pragmatic approach to demystify and shape the academic practice of conducting literature reviews. We concentrate on the types, focuses, considerations, methods, and contributions of literature reviews as inde- pendent, standalone studies. As such, our article serves as an overview that scholars can rely upon to navigate the fundamental elements of literature reviews as stand- alone and independent studies, without getting entangled in the complexities of review procedures, protocols, and nomenclatures.</dc:description><dc:date>2022</dc:date><dc:date>2023-01-12 15:04:56</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>143812</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
