<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=138695"><dc:title>Head-to-head comparison of two rapid high-throughput automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassays targeting total antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and spike protein receptor binding domain</dc:title><dc:creator>Poljak,	Mario	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Oštrbenk Valenčak,	Anja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Štamol,	Tina	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Seme,	Katja	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>SARS-CoV-2</dc:subject><dc:subject>immunoassay</dc:subject><dc:subject>antibody</dc:subject><dc:subject>COVID-19</dc:subject><dc:subject>electrochemiluminescence</dc:subject><dc:description>Background: Accurate anti-SARS-CoV-2 assays are needed to inform diagnostic, therapeutic, and public health decisions. The first manufacturer-independent head-to-head comparison of two rapid high-throughput automated electrochemiluminescence double-antigen sandwich immunoassays targeting total anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies against two different viral proteins, Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Elecsys-N) and Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S (Elecsys-S) (Roche Diagnostics), was performed in a routine setting during the exponential growth phase of the epidemic’s second wave. 
Methods: The diagnostic specificity of Elecsys-N and Elecsys-S was initially evaluated on a panel of 572 pre−COVID-19 samples, showing 100 % specificity of both assays. Elecsys-N/Elecsys-S head-to-head comparison used 3,416 consecutive blood samples from individuals that were tested for the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 within commercial out-of-pocket serologic testing. 
Results: Elecsys-N/Elecsys-S head-to-head comparison showed overall agreement of 98.68 % (3,371/3,416; 95 % CI, 98.23–99.03 %), positive agreement of 95.16 % (884/929; 95 % CI, 93.52–96.41 %), and a high kappa value of 0.996 (95 % CI, 0.956–0.976). Previous SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity was identified in 14/24 (58.3 %) Elecsys-N negative/Elecsys-S positive individuals and in 4/21 (19.0 %) Elecsys-N positive/Elecsys-S negative individuals. 
Conclusion: The first Elecsys-N/Elecsys-S head-to-head comparison showed excellent agreement of two highly specific and rapid high-throughput automated anti-SARS-CoV-2 assays. An important question is whether laboratories offering two different antibody assays could benefit from combining the assays; if so, should use be concomitant or sequential—and, in the latter case, in which order? Based on our results, we favor concomitant over sequential Elecsys-N/Elecsys-S use when testing individuals for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in high-incidence settings; for example, during the exponential or stationary growth phase of the COVID-19 epidemic.</dc:description><dc:date>2021</dc:date><dc:date>2022-08-09 15:00:24</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>138695</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
