<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=137942"><dc:title>Long-term creep compliance of wood polymer composites</dc:title><dc:creator>Bek,	Marko	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Aulova,	Alexandra	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Pušnik Črešnar,	Klementina	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Matkovič,	Sebastjan	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kalin,	Mitjan	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Slemenik Perše,	Lidija	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>wood–polymer composites</dc:subject><dc:subject>creep</dc:subject><dc:subject>durability</dc:subject><dc:subject>wood</dc:subject><dc:subject>recycling</dc:subject><dc:description>Neat (NPP) and recycled (RPP) polypropylene matrix materials were used to prepare wood–polymer composites with untreated wood fibers up to 40 wt.%. Long-term creep properties obtained through the time-temperature superposition showed superior creep resistance of composites with NPP matrix. In part, this is attributed to their higher crystallinity and better interfacial adhesion caused by the formation of a transcrystalline layer. This difference resulted in up to 25% creep compliance reduction of composites with NPP matrix compared to composites with recycled (RPP) polypropylene matrix, which does not form a transcrystalline layer between the fibers and polymer matrix. Despite the overall inferior creep performance of composites with RPP matrix, from the 20 wt.% on, the creep compliance is comparable and even surpasses the creep performance of unfilled NPP matrix and can be a promising way to promote sustainability.</dc:description><dc:date>2022</dc:date><dc:date>2022-07-06 13:40:42</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>137942</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
