<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=136571"><dc:title>Remarks on the local irregularity conjecture</dc:title><dc:creator>Sedlar,	Jelena	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Škrekovski,	Riste	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>locally irregular edge coloring</dc:subject><dc:subject>local irregularity conjecture</dc:subject><dc:subject>unicyclic graph</dc:subject><dc:subject>cactus graph</dc:subject><dc:description>A locally irregular graph is a graph in which the end vertices of every edge have distinct degrees. A locally irregular edge coloring of a graph G is any edge coloring of G such that each of the colors induces a locally irregular subgraph of G. A graph G is colorable if it allows a locally irregular edge coloring. The locally irregular chromatic index of a colorable graph G, denoted by χ$^′_{irr}$(G), is the smallest number of colors used by a locally irregular edge coloring of G. The local irregularity conjecture claims that all graphs, except odd-length paths, odd-length cycles and a certain class of cacti are colorable by three colors. As the conjecture is valid for graphs with a large minimum degree and all non-colorable graphs are vertex disjoint cacti, we study rather sparse graphs. In this paper, we give a cactus graph B which contradicts this conjecture, i.e., χ$^′_{irr}$(B) = 4. Nevertheless, we show that the conjecture holds for unicyclic graphs and cacti with vertex disjoint cycles.</dc:description><dc:date>2021</dc:date><dc:date>2022-05-11 14:54:07</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>136571</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
