<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=135219"><dc:title>Experiences from the past</dc:title><dc:creator>Selišnik,	Irena	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>domestic help workers</dc:subject><dc:subject>legislation</dc:subject><dc:subject>history</dc:subject><dc:subject>Carniola</dc:subject><dc:subject>paternalistic order</dc:subject><dc:description>Domestic service has become a subject of many legislative interventions, nevertheless domestic work still remains elusive from state policy. At first, domestic workers have been frequently singled out from enjoying rights and protective legislation. 
However, even if domestic workers were given formal recognition of rights, regulations generally arrived later than for many other workers and didn’t influence on real empowerment of domestic workers. This durable question of their “problematic position” regarding rights and entitlements can be found in “sectoral disadvantage” which is the direct consequence of the past historical categorization, where legal situation of domestic workers is rooted. </dc:description><dc:date>2021</dc:date><dc:date>2022-03-01 12:25:18</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>135219</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
