<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=133430"><dc:title>Comparison of a five-year survival and cancer recurrence between laparoscopically assisted and open colonic resections due to adenocarcinoma</dc:title><dc:creator>Janež,	Jurij	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Škapin,	Armand Dominik	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>colon cancer</dc:subject><dc:subject>survival</dc:subject><dc:subject>recurrence</dc:subject><dc:subject>surgery</dc:subject><dc:subject>laparoscopy</dc:subject><dc:description>Background and objectives: When resecting colon adenocarcinoma, surgeons decide between the use of laparoscopically assisted and open surgery. Laparoscopic resection is known to have short-term benefits over an open operation. However, researchers are not as unified about the long-term findings. The aim of this research is to elaborate on five-year post-operative differences in survival and cancer recurrence between these two different approaches. Materials and methods: 74 enrolled patients were evaluated five years after a primary operation. We collected dates of deaths of deceased patients and time after operation of possible recurrences. Carcinoma staging was done by a pathologist after operation. Blood samples were taken before surgery in order to measure tumor markers (CA19-9 and CEA). Results: Survival after colonic adenocarcinoma surgery did not differ between the two different surgical approaches (p = 0.151). Recurrence of cancer was not associated with the type of operation (p = 0.532). Patients with recurrence had a 37.6 times greater hazard ratio of dying (95% CI: [12.0, 118]; p &lt; 0.001). Advanced age adversely affected survival: patients aged &lt; 0.001). Patients with different TNM stages did not have any statistically significant differences in survival (HR$_{II}$ = 2.49; 95% CI: [0.67, 9.30]; p$_{II}$ = 0.173) (HR$_{III}$ = 2.18; 95% CI: [0.58, 8.12]; p$_{III}$ = 0.246) or recurrence (p = 0.097). Conclusion: The obtained results suggest that laparoscopic resection of colon cancer is not inferior from an oncologic point of view and results in a similar long-term survival and disease-free interval. Recurrence of carcinoma, older age at initial operation and elevated tumor markers, above a pre-set threshold at operation, were found to be independent factors of lower survival. We believe that the obtained results will be of benefit when choosing treatment for colon adenocarcinoma.</dc:description><dc:date>2020</dc:date><dc:date>2021-11-26 13:00:48</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>133430</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
