<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=124558"><dc:title>Practising ethically during COVID-19</dc:title><dc:creator>Banks,	Sarah	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Cai,	Tianxin	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>De Jonge,	Ed	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Shears,	Jane	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Shum Hei Yan,	Michelle	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sobočan,	Ana Marija	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Strom-Gottfried,	Kimberly	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Truell,	Rory	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Úriz Pemán,	María Jesús	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Weinberg,	Merlinda	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>COVID-19</dc:subject><dc:subject>ethical logistics</dc:subject><dc:subject>ethics</dc:subject><dc:subject>inequities</dc:subject><dc:subject>pandemic</dc:subject><dc:subject>social work</dc:subject><dc:description>This article draws on findings of an international study of social workers' ethical challenges during COVID-19, based on 607 responses to a qualitative survey. Ethical challenges included the following: maintaining trust, privacy, dignity and service user autonomy in remote relationships; allocating limited resources; balancing rights and needs of different parties; deciding whether to break or bend policies in the interests of service users; and handling emotions and ensuring care of self and colleagues. The article considers regional contrasts, the "ethical logistics" of complex decision-making, the impact of societal inequities, and lessons for social workers and professional practice around the globe.</dc:description><dc:date>2020</dc:date><dc:date>2021-02-02 15:24:10</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>124558</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
