<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=124498"><dc:title>Numerical and experimental investigation of the energy and exergy performance of solar thermal, photovoltaic and photovoltaic-thermal modules based on roll-bond heat exchangers</dc:title><dc:creator>Poredoš,	Primož	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Tomc,	Urban	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Petelin,	Nada	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Vidrih,	Boris	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Flisar,	Uroš	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kitanovski,	Andrej	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>PV/T</dc:subject><dc:subject>photovoltaic</dc:subject><dc:subject>solar thermal collectors</dc:subject><dc:subject>absorbers</dc:subject><dc:subject>heat exchangers</dc:subject><dc:subject>exergy</dc:subject><dc:description>This paper presents numerical and experimental energy and exergy performance assessments of solar thermal (ST), photovoltaic (PV) and photovoltaic/thermal (PV/T) modules based on roll-bond heat exchangers having three different channel geometries: serial, parallel and bionic. The validation of a coupled numerical simulation encompassing the thermo-hydraulic and electrical properties shows that 78% of all the data lies within a+/-10% uncertainty. The thermo-hydraulic simulation shows that the lowest outlet-water temperature inside the absorber is for the case of the bionic absorber (average 44.1%°C vs. 46.5%°C for the serial). This geometry is also beneficial when considering pressure losses, since compared to the parallel configuration (average 778%Pa) the bionic has significantly lower pressure losses (average 385%Pa). The simulation of the electrical properties of PV/T with all three absorber types showed the highest average solar-to-electrical efficiency (14.5%) in the case of the bionic absorber compared to the PV/T with parallel and serial absorbers (14.4% and 14.3%, respectively). Finally, a set of experiments using the ST, PV and PV/T2 (the index 2 denotes a PV/T collector variant with a foil thickness of 0.3%mm, compared to the thickness of 0.4%mm for PV/T1, positioned between the absorber and the PV cells) modules showed that the PV module, coupled with a bionic absorber plate, achieves the highest average electrical (PV - 8.5% vs. PV/T2 - 9.9%) and exergy (ST - 4.4% vs. PV - 9.2% vs. PV/T2 - 12.7%) efficiencies. Only in terms of the thermal efficiency, the PV/T is at a disadvantage to the ST (PV/T2 - 33.5% vs. ST - 61.4%) due to the air gap between the front glass and the absorber of the latter module.</dc:description><dc:date>2020</dc:date><dc:date>2021-01-27 13:09:23</dc:date><dc:type>Članek v reviji</dc:type><dc:identifier>124498</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
