<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=114905"><dc:title>Soft nanotechnology</dc:title><dc:creator>Fink,	Rok	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Oder,	Martina	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Jukić,	Jasmina	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Cindro,	Nikola	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:creator>Požar,	Josip	(Avtor)
	</dc:creator><dc:subject>anti-adhesion potentials</dc:subject><dc:subject>bacterial adhesion</dc:subject><dc:subject>E. coli</dc:subject><dc:subject>surface hygiene</dc:subject><dc:subject>polyelectrolyte multilayers</dc:subject><dc:description>Preventing bacterial attachment to surfaces is the most efficient approach to controlling biofilm proliferation. The aim of this study was to compare anti-adhesion potentials of 5 and 50 mmol/L polyelectrolyte multilayers of poly(allylamine hydrochloride)/poly(sodium 4–styrenesulfonate), poly(4-vinyl-N-ethylpyridinium bromide)/ poly(sodium 4–styrenesulfonate), and poly(4-vinyl-N-isobutylpyridinium bromide)/poly(sodium 4–styrenesulfonate) against Escherichia coli. Glass surface was covered with five polyelectrolyte layers and exposed to bacterial suspensions. Poly(4-vinyl-N-ethylpyridinium bromide)/poly(sodium 4–styrenesulfonate) was the most effective against bacterial adhesion, having reduced it by 60 %, followed by poly(4-vinyl-N-isobutylpyridinium bromide)/poly(sodium 4– styrenesulfonate) (47 %), and poly(allylamine hydrochloride)/poly(sodium 4–styrenesulfonate) (38 %). Polyelectrolyte multilayers with quaternary amine groups have a significant anti-adhesion potential and could find their place in coatings for food, pharmaceutical, and medical industry.</dc:description><dc:date>2020</dc:date><dc:date>2020-03-30 13:08:36</dc:date><dc:type>Neznano</dc:type><dc:identifier>114905</dc:identifier><dc:language>sl</dc:language></rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
