Podrobno

Dialogic artificial intelligence in the architectural design studio : an empirical study of the AI sparring model
ID Stanimirović, Mirko (Avtor), ID Wang, Jiaqi (Avtor), ID Zupančič, Domen (Avtor), ID Momčilović-Petronijević, Ana (Avtor), ID Ćirić, Ivan (Avtor)

.pdfPDF - Predstavitvena datoteka, prenos (8,22 MB)
MD5: A7C35289A3F017817B35841449D5F061
URLURL - Izvorni URL, za dostop obiščite https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/16/14/2878 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Izvleček
Integrating generative artificial intelligence into architectural education raises a question not only of whether AI helps, but of how its use should be structured. This paper empirically examines the AI Sparring model—a dialogic, critical approach to student–AI interaction—through a workshop in which architecture students designed a pavilion in a fortress. The three self-selected groups differed in the role AI played in the formation of the concept, not in its final presentation: Group A developed concepts traditionally, through sketches and physical working models, with AI serving only as a rendering tool at the end; Group B used AI directly as a generative tool; and Group C worked through structured critical dialogue with AI. The works were independently rated by three evaluators from three countries, alongside keyword analysis and assessment of reflective depth and theoretical references. Group C produced the most consistent concept quality, with no weak works, yet the single highest-rated work came from the traditional group—Sparring raises the “floor” rather than the “ceiling” of quality. At the same time, Group C reported the lowest sense of authorship, and qualitative analysis revealed “simulated depth”: theoretical references cited without genuine engagement. Because of the small, self-selected samples, the findings are read as exploratory and hypothesis-generating. The paper sheds light on the limits of reflective AI pedagogy and proposes concrete revisions to the model.

Jezik:Angleški jezik
Ključne besede:artificial intelligence, architectural education, AI sparring, critical thinking, reflective practice, generative AI, design studio, authorship, AI colab
Vrsta gradiva:Članek v reviji
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:FA - Fakulteta za arhitekturo
Status publikacije:Objavljeno
Različica publikacije:Objavljena publikacija
Datum objave:19.07.2026
Leto izida:2026
Št. strani:23 str.
Številčenje:Vol. 16, iss. 14, [article no.] 2878
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-188387 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
UDK:004.8:72:37
ISSN pri članku:2075-5309
DOI:10.3390/buildings16142878 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
COBISS.SI-ID:291619587 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
Datum objave v RUL:22.09.2026
Število ogledov:154
Število prenosov:38
Metapodatki:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Kopiraj citat
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:Buildings
Skrajšan naslov:Buildings
Založnik:Molecular Diversity Preservation International
ISSN:2075-5309
COBISS.SI-ID:1024478292 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Licence

Licenca:CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 Mednarodna
Povezava:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.sl
Opis:To je standardna licenca Creative Commons, ki daje uporabnikom največ možnosti za nadaljnjo uporabo dela, pri čemer morajo navesti avtorja.

Sekundarni jezik

Jezik:Slovenski jezik
Ključne besede:umetna inteligenca, arhitekturno izobraževanje, sodelovanje z UI, kritično mišljenje, reflektivna praksa, generativna UI, avtorstvo, sodelo z UI

Podobna dela

Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:

Nazaj