Vaš brskalnik ne omogoča JavaScript!
JavaScript je nujen za pravilno delovanje teh spletnih strani. Omogočite JavaScript ali pa uporabite sodobnejši brskalnik.
Repozitorij Univerze v Ljubljani
Nacionalni portal odprte znanosti
Odprta znanost
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Iskanje
Napredno
Novo v RUL
Kaj je RUL
V številkah
Pomoč
Prijava
Podrobno
Dialogic artificial intelligence in the architectural design studio : an empirical study of the AI sparring model
ID
Stanimirović, Mirko
(
Avtor
),
ID
Wang, Jiaqi
(
Avtor
),
ID
Zupančič, Domen
(
Avtor
),
ID
Momčilović-Petronijević, Ana
(
Avtor
),
ID
Ćirić, Ivan
(
Avtor
)
PDF - Predstavitvena datoteka,
prenos
(8,22 MB)
MD5: A7C35289A3F017817B35841449D5F061
URL - Izvorni URL, za dostop obiščite
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/16/14/2878
Galerija slik
Izvleček
Integrating generative artificial intelligence into architectural education raises a question not only of whether AI helps, but of how its use should be structured. This paper empirically examines the AI Sparring model—a dialogic, critical approach to student–AI interaction—through a workshop in which architecture students designed a pavilion in a fortress. The three self-selected groups differed in the role AI played in the formation of the concept, not in its final presentation: Group A developed concepts traditionally, through sketches and physical working models, with AI serving only as a rendering tool at the end; Group B used AI directly as a generative tool; and Group C worked through structured critical dialogue with AI. The works were independently rated by three evaluators from three countries, alongside keyword analysis and assessment of reflective depth and theoretical references. Group C produced the most consistent concept quality, with no weak works, yet the single highest-rated work came from the traditional group—Sparring raises the “floor” rather than the “ceiling” of quality. At the same time, Group C reported the lowest sense of authorship, and qualitative analysis revealed “simulated depth”: theoretical references cited without genuine engagement. Because of the small, self-selected samples, the findings are read as exploratory and hypothesis-generating. The paper sheds light on the limits of reflective AI pedagogy and proposes concrete revisions to the model.
Jezik:
Angleški jezik
Ključne besede:
artificial intelligence
,
architectural education
,
AI sparring
,
critical thinking
,
reflective practice
,
generative AI
,
design studio
,
authorship
,
AI colab
Vrsta gradiva:
Članek v reviji
Tipologija:
1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:
FA - Fakulteta za arhitekturo
Status publikacije:
Objavljeno
Različica publikacije:
Objavljena publikacija
Datum objave:
19.07.2026
Leto izida:
2026
Št. strani:
23 str.
Številčenje:
Vol. 16, iss. 14, [article no.] 2878
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-188387
UDK:
004.8:72:37
ISSN pri članku:
2075-5309
DOI:
10.3390/buildings16142878
COBISS.SI-ID:
291619587
Datum objave v RUL:
22.09.2026
Število ogledov:
154
Število prenosov:
38
Metapodatki:
Citiraj gradivo
Navadno besedilo
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Kopiraj citat
Objavi na:
Gradivo je del revije
Naslov:
Buildings
Skrajšan naslov:
Buildings
Založnik:
Molecular Diversity Preservation International
ISSN:
2075-5309
COBISS.SI-ID:
1024478292
Licence
Licenca:
CC BY 4.0, Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva 4.0 Mednarodna
Povezava:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.sl
Opis:
To je standardna licenca Creative Commons, ki daje uporabnikom največ možnosti za nadaljnjo uporabo dela, pri čemer morajo navesti avtorja.
Sekundarni jezik
Jezik:
Slovenski jezik
Ključne besede:
umetna inteligenca
,
arhitekturno izobraževanje
,
sodelovanje z UI
,
kritično mišljenje
,
reflektivna praksa
,
generativna UI
,
avtorstvo
,
sodelo z UI
Podobna dela
Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:
Nazaj