The master’s thesis addresses the economic challenges of the public procurement
system in the public sector, with an emphasis on the impact of the legislative
framework, competitiveness, and procedural efficiency. Particular attention is given to
the role of public procurement as a tool for the rational use of public funds and for
ensuring transparency and equal treatment of suppliers. The aim of the research is to
assess the impact of legislative changes, particularly the Public Procurement Act (ZJN-
3), on the operation and efficiency of the public procurement system in Slovenia.
The research is based on the use of multiple research methods, including analysis,
normative methods, case study, and comparative methods. The analytical part utilises
statistical data on public procurement, including the use of framework agreements,
electronic auctions, publications on the public procurement portal, the number of
single-supplier contracts, and the application of award criteria. Additionally, a
comparative analysis of Slovenia and Croatia is conducted based on official statistical
reports for 2024.
The findings indicate that, although the legislative framework for public procurement in
Slovenia is relatively well organised, the system still faces significant challenges. Key
issues include a high proportion of single-supplier contracts, the predominance of the
lowest-price criterion, and limited competitiveness, all of which negatively affect
procedural efficiency and economic performance. The comparison with Croatia further
highlights the importance of greater transparency in publications, more frequent use of
digital tools, and active promotion of competition.
The results of the research are useful for policymakers, contracting authorities, and
suppliers, as they facilitate improvements in transparency, efficiency, and
competitiveness in public procurement procedures. They also contribute to a better
understanding of the economic, legal, and organisational aspects of the system and
support the development of practical recommendations. Future research is
recommended to include a more in-depth analysis of procurement procedures, the
long-term effects of using the most economically advantageous tender criterion, and
the impact of advanced digital solutions.
|