Vaš brskalnik ne omogoča JavaScript!
JavaScript je nujen za pravilno delovanje teh spletnih strani. Omogočite JavaScript ali pa uporabite sodobnejši brskalnik.
Repozitorij Univerze v Ljubljani
Nacionalni portal odprte znanosti
Odprta znanost
DiKUL
slv
|
eng
Iskanje
Napredno
Novo v RUL
Kaj je RUL
V številkah
Pomoč
Prijava
Podrobno
A comparative analysis of MDCM methods based on pairwise comparison : AHP, BWM and FUCOM
ID
Grošelj, Petra
(
Avtor
),
ID
Dolinar, Gregor
(
Avtor
)
PDF - Predstavitvena datoteka,
prenos
(795,43 KB)
MD5: 920F4AF4E2B5B82684AAC1202EBCA3A5
Galerija slik
Izvleček
MCDM methods based on pairwise comparisons are widely used to determine the weights of alternatives and criteria in complex problems. In this paper, we compare three of these methods: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Best-Worst method (BWM) and Full Consistency Method (FUCOM). We compared the number of pairwise comparisons required and the amount of information provided by the experts as well as the consistency of the judgments. The data came from a study on the ranking of driving parameters of business and production management in small and medium-sized enterprises. The results show that AHP with the higher requirement of pairwise comparisons also leads to very reliable weights, while a lower number of pairwise comparisons in BWM and FUCOM, as appealing as it is to the experts, could significantly reduce the input data and decisively influence the ranking of items. Our study also disproves the statement repeatedly found in the literature that BWM is more consistent than AHP due to the lower number of pairwise comparisons required. Rather, we have pointed out the problem of measuring inconsistency in BWM. For FUCOM, we have provided explicit formulas for calculating the weights.
Jezik:
Angleški jezik
Ključne besede:
multi-criteria decision making
,
pairwise comparisons
,
analytic hierarchy process
,
best-worst method
,
full consistency method
Tipologija:
1.08 - Objavljeni znanstveni prispevek na konferenci
Organizacija:
BF - Biotehniška fakulteta
Status publikacije:
Objavljeno
Različica publikacije:
Objavljena publikacija
Leto izida:
2025
Št. strani:
Str. 256-266
PID:
20.500.12556/RUL-171945
UDK:
519.8(0.034.2)(082.22)
DOI:
10.5937/IMCSM25256G
COBISS.SI-ID:
247652611
Avtorske pravice:
Podatki o licenci niso navedeni v članku, ampak samo v kolofonu zbornika (
https://doi.org/10.5937/IMCSM25
).
Datum objave v RUL:
04.09.2025
Število ogledov:
867
Število prenosov:
253
Metapodatki:
Citiraj gradivo
Navadno besedilo
BibTeX
EndNote XML
EndNote/Refer
RIS
ABNT
ACM Ref
AMA
APA
Chicago 17th Author-Date
Harvard
IEEE
ISO 690
MLA
Vancouver
:
Kopiraj citat
Objavi na:
Gradivo je del monografije
Naslov:
Strategic management : touch the new wave
Uredniki:
Đorđe Nikolić
Kraj izida:
Bor
Založnik:
University of Belgrade, Technical Faculty, Management Department
Leto izida:
2025
ISBN:
978-86-6305-160-7
COBISS.SI-ID:
169576201
Naslov zbirke:
IMCSM Proceedings
Številčenje v zbirki:
vol. 21, issue 1 (2025)
ISSN zbirke:
2620-0597
Licence
Licenca:
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Nekomercialno-Brez predelav 4.0 Mednarodna
Povezava:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.sl
Opis:
Najbolj omejujoča licenca Creative Commons. Uporabniki lahko prenesejo in delijo delo v nekomercialne namene in ga ne smejo uporabiti za nobene druge namene.
Sekundarni jezik
Jezik:
Slovenski jezik
Ključne besede:
večkriterijsko odločanje
,
parne primerjave
,
analitični hierarhični proces
,
metoda najboljše-najslabše
,
metoda FUCOM
Projekti
Financer:
ARIS - Javna agencija za znanstvenoraziskovalno in inovacijsko dejavnost Republike Slovenije
Številka projekta:
P4-0059
Naslov:
Gozd, gozdarstvo in obnovljivi gozdni viri
Podobna dela
Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:
Nazaj