izpis_h1_title_alt

Questioning the ASTM G32-16 (stationary specimen) standard cavitation erosion test
ID Dular, Matevž (Avtor), ID Barragan Montalvo, Guillermo Enrique (Avtor), ID Hočevar, Marko (Avtor), ID Novak, Lovrenc (Avtor), ID Ohl, Claus-Dieter (Avtor), ID Petkovšek, Martin (Avtor)

.pdfPDF - Predstavitvena datoteka, prenos (7,65 MB)
MD5: 6B7B8537FD7DE15DADE36C5EAAAC1749
URLURL - Izvorni URL, za dostop obiščite https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350417724001780 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Izvleček
Cavitation erosion is one of the most severe problems encountered in hydraulic turbomachinery. When testing the materials, the engineers usually rely on standardized procedures. The most common one being the vibratory ASTM G-32 test, which offers two possibilities of performing the test – the direct, where the specimen is attached to the ultrasonic device and the indirect, where the specimen is stationary and exposed to the ultrasonic horn, positioned just 0.5 mm from it. The erosion rates from the two are significantly different and a question may be asked if they are at all comparable and further on are they comparable to the “real-life” hydrodynamic cavitation which occurs in turbomachinery. In this study we performed erosion tests on a stationary specimen where the gap between the specimen and the horn was varied from 0.3 to 4 mm. In addition, we used high speed visualization to observe the cavitation in the gap. We observed that the cavitation erosion rate strongly depends on the gap. From visualization we see that the cavitation dynamics significantly changes in a small gap, leading to a large, but 2-dimensional cavitation bubbles which collapse very slowly, compared to the small spherical ones in a larger gap. We investigated the probability of shock wave occurrence and derived a very simple model, which gives accurate qualitative predictions of experimental data. Finally, the study puts into question the validity of ASTM G32 test – the most common approach used in engineering today.

Jezik:Angleški jezik
Ključne besede:cavitation, bubbles, erosion, G32 standard
Vrsta gradiva:Članek v reviji
Tipologija:1.01 - Izvirni znanstveni članek
Organizacija:FS - Fakulteta za strojništvo
Status publikacije:Objavljeno
Različica publikacije:Objavljena publikacija
Leto izida:2024
Št. strani:10
Številčenje:Vol. 107, art. 106930
PID:20.500.12556/RUL-158473 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
UDK:532.528
ISSN pri članku:1350-4177
DOI:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2024.106930 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
COBISS.SI-ID:198798083 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu
Datum objave v RUL:13.06.2024
Število ogledov:308
Število prenosov:58
Metapodatki:XML DC-XML DC-RDF
:
Kopiraj citat
Objavi na:Bookmark and Share

Gradivo je del revije

Naslov:Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
Skrajšan naslov:Ultrason. sonochem.
Založnik:Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier Science
ISSN:1350-4177
COBISS.SI-ID:707668 Povezava se odpre v novem oknu

Licence

Licenca:CC BY-NC 4.0, Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Nekomercialno 4.0 Mednarodna
Povezava:http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.sl
Opis:Licenca Creative Commons, ki prepoveduje komercialno uporabo, vendar uporabniki ne rabijo upravljati materialnih avtorskih pravic na izpeljanih delih z enako licenco.

Sekundarni jezik

Jezik:Slovenski jezik
Ključne besede:kavitacija, mehurčki, erozija, G32 standard

Projekti

Financer:EC - European Commission
Program financ.:H2020
Številka projekta:771567
Naslov:An investigation of the mechanisms at the interaction between cavitation bubbles and contaminants
Akronim:CABUM

Financer:ARIS - Javna agencija za znanstvenoraziskovalno in inovacijsko dejavnost Republike Slovenije
Številka projekta:P2-0422
Naslov:Funkcionalne tekočine za napredne energetske sisteme

Financer:Drugi - Drug financer ali več financerjev
Program financ.:Humboldt Foundation Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel Research Award

Podobna dela

Podobna dela v RUL:
Podobna dela v drugih slovenskih zbirkah:

Nazaj