Introduction: Lung transplantation is the final treatment option in the end stage of certain lung diseases, once all possible conservative treatments have been exhausted. Lung transplantation can improve the patient’s quality of life and prolong life expectancy. An optimal nutritional status is associated with better post-transplant outcomes and survival. Nutrition after transplantation is the key for reducing the risk of complications and optimal recovery. Purpose: The purpose of this diploma work is to highlight the nutritional support after lung transplantation and its importance. The greatest emphasis is on the early and late post-transplant period. Methods: We used a qualitative research approach. The research problem was considered from two different aspects. The first aspect was the analysis of scientific studies of the research problem and the second aspect was the interview of the patient after lung transplantation. The data collection method was conducted by conducting a semi-structured interview where we focused on 7 major thematic sets. We selected a man who successfully underwent a lung transplant procedure. We processed the obtained data in the ATLAS.ti program. Results: The results were presented graphically and descriptively. The data obtained from the interview were arranged into thematic sections and organized according to the selected codes. The interviewee described the symptoms of COPD, with an emphasis on shortness of breath on exertion and physical impotence. He also described feelings that he experienced when he found out that his lungs will be transplanted. He described the medical treatment in all 7 selected periods and pointed out the lack of health education and especially nutritional support. The interviewee described the complications that arose because of taking immunosuppressive therapy. He said he developed hyperglycaemia, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia. For all the listed complications, he received only drug therapy. He did not receive any lifestyle advice or dietary adjustments. Discussion and conclusion: We found that there are large differences between medical treatment in the clinical environment in Slovenia and abroad. Compared to foreign recommendations and guidelines, the patient's medical treatment was deficient. Above all, the lack of adequate nutritional support, rehabilitation and health education was evident.
|