Problematika trditvenega in dokaznega bremena v pravdnem postopku : magistrsko diplomsko delo

Štaba Pečnik, Neja (avtor), Galič, Aleš (mentor)

Trditveno in dokazno breme je uzakonitev razpravnega načela. V svojem bistvu sta to dve ločeni bremeni pravdnih strank, ki morajo za svoj uspeh v pravdi zadostiti obema. Trditveno breme na stranko nalaga, da poda jasne, konkretne in popolne trditve o dejstvih, na katere opira svoje zahtevke oziroma ugovore in da konkretno prereka navedbe nasprotne stranke. Dokazno breme pa od stranke terja, da poda substancirane dokazne predloge, kar pomeni, da mora ob dokaznem predlogu navesti, zakaj je dokaz pravno relevanten in ugotavljanju katerega dejstva služi. Materialno trditveno in dokazno breme je ves čas postopka na isti stranki, medtem ko je procesno trditveno in dokazno breme odvisno od navedb in dokazov nasprotne stranke in v postopku prehaja od ene na drugo. Omilitev razpravnega načela je materialno procesno vodstvo, omejitev razpravnega načela pa so prekluzije. Magistrsko delo najprej preučuje zahteve naslovnih bremen, na koncu pa obravnava problematične materialnopravne določbe, pri čemer se pri obeh delih osredotoča na sodno prakso, ki pogosto odpira številno problematiko naslovnih bremen.

• Jezik: Slovenski jezik
• Ključne besede: trditveno breme, dokazno breme, pravdni postopek, skrbnost strank, konkretizirane navedbe, substancirani dokazni predlogi
• Vrsta gradiva: Magistrsko delo/naloga
• Tipologija: 2.09 - Magistrsko delo
• Organizacija: PF - Pravna fakulteta
• Kraj izida: Ljubljana
• Založnik: [N. Štaba Pečnik]
• Leto izida: 2020
• Št. strani: IV, 54 f.
• PID: 20.500.12556/RUL-120039
• UDK: 347.91/.95(497.4)(043.2)
• COBISS.SI-ID: 28695043
• Datum objave v RUL: 15.09.2020

ŠTABA PEČNIK, Neja, 2020, Problematika trditvenega in dokaznega bremena v pravdnem postopku : magistrsko diplomsko delo [na spletu]. Magistrsko delo. Ljubljana : N. Štaba Pečnik. [Dostopano 21 april 2025]. Pridobljeno s: https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=slv&id=120039

Sekundarni jezik

• Jezik: Angleški jezik
• Naslov: Issues regarding burden of allegation and burden of proof in civil proceedings

Izvleček

Burden of allegation and burden of proof are enactment of adversary principle. In essence, these are two separate burdens of litigants who must satisfy them both to succeed in litigation. Burden of allegation or duty to substantiate a claim requires the litigant to provide clear, concrete and complete statements about the facts, by which their claims or objections are substantiated, and to contest the other party’s claims in a concrete manner. Burden of proof requires the litigant to provide a substantiated request for proof, which means that they have to explain why the evidence is relevant and which fact it serves to establish. The same party is a subject of substantive burden of allegation and burden of proof throughout the proceedings, while the procedural burden of allegation and burden of proof depend on the statements and proof provided by the opposing party and passes from one to another throughout the proceedings. The relaxation of adversary principle is substantive conduct of proceedings, while the limitation of adversary principle are preclusions. The master's thesis firstly examines the requirements of burden of allegation and burden of proof and at the end, it deals with problematic substantive provisions, throughout focusing on the case law, which often opens up many issues regarding the titled burdens.

• Ključne besede: burden of allegation, burden of proof, civil procedure, parties’ diligence, concrete statements, substantiated request for proof